alex ♥ 22 ♥ he/him ♥ film student and aspiring poet ♥ ACAB
alex ♥ 22 ♥ he/him ♥ film student and aspiring poet ♥ ACAB
people on this website be like “it’s actually school’s fault that i don’t know how to read because i wanted to write my essay on the divergent trilogy and that BITCH mrs. clarkson made us study 1984 instead. anyway here’s a 10 tweet thread of easily disproven misinformation about a 3 year old news story and btw, who is toni morrison?”
i KNOW most of y’all are lying about being in the gifted program as children because none of you could pass the basic reading comprehension assessment they give third graders today
this post is mean and I never read divergent or whatever the fuck but 1984 sucks and is rape apologism so if somebody wanted to write about divergent or whatever good for them
this reply is like literally exactly what op is talking about lol. like firstly ops point isn’t “1984 is good”, ops point is that analysing complex stories teaches you how to form opinions and think for yourself. and like secondly in 1984 you’re supposed to think damn it’s fucked up that he’s thinking that way about her, i wonder if this ties in with the central theme of “a society like this will fuck you in the head”? (this is the thinking for yourself part). like do you think orwell just put that in for fun? do you think that just because winston is the protagonist you’re supposed to agree with everything he does?
You know I feel like this post just gave me an epiphany for what is wrong with how Tumblr Fandom/Internet Fandom responds to media-or not *wrong* but makes it very hard to respond to anything but a morally correct, and heroic protagonist.
When an English teacher, or reader, taught or picked up 1984, it wasn’t with the intention they were going to love the protagonist. They picked it up with the intention of reading a whole story and trying to grasp the theme or catharsis from the story. If the protagonist was a *shitty* person it played into the the themes or the story, because it wasn’t about morally judging the book or *liking* or feeling attachment to the protagonist. Sometimes and often times, books were just about gaining another perspective.
No one read Lolita expecting to endear, or like, or be inspired by Humbert. You are supposed to be upset by his behavior, you don’t read Lolita with the intention of being inspired. You read it to learn more about what the fuck is going on inside someone’s head when they behave like that. How children get sucked into abusive situations. Or read “The Great Gatsby” not because they want to fall in love with Gatsby or Nick, but to better understand and analyze the experience of the 1920s or destitution of the American Dream.
A lot of internet and fandom culture has changed that though. When we say something like “I love the Great Gatsby” it comes with the idea or association that means you must *love* or relate to one of the characters. And maybe you do, but the first assumption is not longer about the quality of the work or themes, or cathartic impact-it’s about character admiration. And with that character admiration, in tumblr stan culture, or kin culture, or exalting characters with fanart/romance/so on you don’t just ‘admire’ or find that character ‘compelling’ it now translates to ‘you LOVE that character’ or you ‘DIRECTLY relate to that character.’
You can’t say “I love how Humbert is written, it’s so fascinating and dark”, without it directly translating you somehow relate to a child abuser or condone his actions. Taking in media has become an act of worship and connection. We no longer watch meant to just see the story as a whole, we watch expecting to connect to a character and if we offer them our “worship” as it’s become, as opposed to just attention or interest study as it traditionally was, it means we are condoning the character or saying we directly empathize with all their actions.
I think that’s why there is often now so much fuss over *toxic* characters or not. Or whether that classical novel is showing good or bad things anymore. We’re treating the characters as people we should love or want to draw or write about. Sometimes a story is just about getting the the theme or catharsis or learning another perspective. We don’t NEED to like the character. Or we don’t HAVE to like a character to be impressed by how they’re written or intrigued by their behavior.
I think if internet culture could learn to view stories as small insights into other lives or single takes of one perspective instead of purposeful moral inspirations we’d be a lot less worried about how toxic or not toxic they are.
considering it’s black history month, UNFRIENDLY reminder that police brutality and racism aren’t magically gone just because joe biden’s the president now. keep the energy you did for george floyd, breonna taylor, sandra bland, ahmaud arbery, atatiana jefferson, and many many more these next four years. there’s still so much work that needs to be done. we CANNOT give up.
(via lokidokeyartichoki)
Anonymous asked: you know what lowkey gets me about dnp? how im yet to find someone who met them and says theyre dicks or even just slightly unpleasant. nope, its always people saying theyre very nice
philsbigduck-deactivated2021120:
lmk if i’m wrong but i have yet to ever see anyone, a fan, a coworker, a youtuber, former people who worked with them, ever say anything but positive shit. like they’ve been around a lot of people. and for people to say, usually on their own accord, that they’re super nice, even to people who have been dicks to them *cough* sh*ne d*wson *cough* says a lot about their character
i think that’s what draws people to them. they’ve one of the few creators on youtube who seem just like genuinely nice people.
dan has a dickish persona he used to portray sometimes in earlier content, but like it’s obviously a persona. that’s the only thing i could really think.
i also think that’s why they’ve never been “cancelled.” theyve just always been super nice people who somehow stay relevant and humble.
they’re very real, current, and not a dick. which is why i think so many are drawn to them
Anonymous asked: you kinda do give off onceler kin vibes
you couldve pulled my spine out my ass like the rip cord of a chainsaw and that still wouldve been kinder than saying this
bibo:
Saying “terfs unfollow me” isnt the big statement you think it is. If you want terfs to fuck off you must have unwavering love and support for trans women, and do what you can to boost trans women’s voices. And you must block every single terf you come across. The goal isnt to dunk on terfs, the goal is to uplift and create safety for trans women.
(via tangsweet)
